Connect with us

News

Witness Testifies Against Former JTF Commander Over Alleged N8.5bn Fraud

A prosecution witness, P, Dabi Gideon Dachung, has testified in the ongoing trial of a former Joint Military Task Force Commander, Maj.- Gen. Emmanuel Atewe (retd.) for alleged N8.5bn fraud.

Advertisement

The third witness gave more evidence against him on Wednesday before Justice Ayokunle Faji of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos.

Atewe is being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) alongside Patrick Akpobolokemi, a former Director-General of Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), Kime Enzogu and Josephine Otuaga on a 22-count charge of conspiracy stealing and money laundering to the N8.5billion.

Advertisement

READ: You Ought to Be Tied Up And Dropped In The Atlantic Ocean, Fani-Kayode Blasts Senator Who Introduced Bill to Ban Generators

The defendants allegedly conspired amongst themselves to defraud NIMASA of the said sum, using companies which include Jagan Limited, Jagan Trading Company Limited, Jagan Global Services Limited, Al-Nald Limited, Paper Warehouse Limited, Eastpoint Integrated Services Limited and De-Newlink Integrated Service Limited.

Advertisement

At the resumed hearing on Wednesday, Justice Faji, in a short ruling, rejected the document sought to be tendered in evidence by the prosecution on the grounds that the said document had been rejected initially by the court.

Following the ruling, Dachung, who is a Forensic Analyst and Document Examiner with the EFCC, in his further testimony, revealed to the court that his opinion as a result of the analysis he carried on the two sets of documents contained a disputed document and a known-disputed document (requested statement document).

Advertisement

“The author of the known-disputed document wrote the disputed handwriting and the signatures in question and also the dates as well as names in the two sets of documents.”

“For him to arrive at this opinion as a result of his findings, he relied on the three principles of handwriting identification first by determining the presence or absence of handwriting identity characteristics in both the documents to reflect the presence of similarities and differences.

Advertisement

“The three principles satisfied that the handwriting on the two sets of documents has the same line qualities, same slant of writing, same alignment and same height ratio of letters; and that there were connections between the characters of words for the handwriting and the signatures.

“Also, the pen lifts in the two sets of documents determined that the handwriting and signatures seemed to be natural and unnatural due to the fact that the disputed handwriting was fluently written to skill up the signatures.

Advertisement

“Both turned out to be similar and the two sets of documents fall within the same level of skill writing,” Dachung told the court.

READ: Coronavirus: Massachusetts’ Case Doubles As Governor Declares State of Emergency

Advertisement

According to the witness, the same person who had the handwriting on the two sets of documents had the signatures “because the signatures have pictorial resemblance as the handwriting does.”

In his findings, Dachung said that his findings and opinion were not in any way influenced by the management of the EFCC or by his status as an employee of the Commission.

Advertisement

READ: Coronavirus: Massachusetts’ Case Doubles As Governor Declares State of Emergency

Dachung further explained that all equipment used during the analysis of the two sets of documents were working perfectly as at the time he conducted the analysis and that his opinion and analysis were based on what he saw with his eyes coupled with the aid of equipment he used.

Advertisement

When all documents tendered and admitted in evidence in the case were requested by the defence team to be given to the witness to show the court if the report of his findings were tendered and admitted, he replied that he had given oral evidence, which he believed had been admitted in evidence.

The matter was adjourned till March 12, 2020, for the continuation of trial.

Advertisement

. Witness Testifies Against Former JTF Commander Over Alleged N8.5bn Fraud Follow iDONSABI.

Advertisement

Witness Testifies Against Former JTF Commander Over Alleged N8.5bn Fraud

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

19 − nineteen =

X